Kamenetz does describe
events chronologically and that, along with the first person narratives she
includes, will be helpful to future scholars (as will the notes section that
comprises roughly twenty percent of the text). Citing alarming statistics from
the APA, she also devotes an entire chapter to mental health, a critical aspect
that continues to impact students. Again, there was very little central
coordination – with over $200 billion allocated to schools from the Trump and
Biden administrations, it seems like exemplary programs could have been
identified and scaled up. In her concluding chapter, Kamenetz mentions some broader
examples: MIT’s Justin Reich highlighting themes of “healing, community, and humanity;” Oakland Reach and its community activism;
Guilford County, North Carolina’s increased graduation rate. She stresses
patterns of strong relationships and student agency – elements of choice – in the
curriculum. Ultimately, Kamenetz advocates for “the need to put children at the
center of our decision making in a way we never have before in this country.” A
laudable goal that requires a significant mindset shift. If we repeatedly could
not put students first during the height of the pandemic, why think we are
capable of doing so now?
Thursday, August 4, 2022
The Stolen Year by Anya Kamenetz
I am surprised and disappointed at the initial very negative
tone in THE STOLEN YEAR by Anya Kamenetz, a former education
correspondent for NPR. Although she
subtitled the book “How COVID Changed Children's Lives, and Where We Go Now,”
she argues that the impact of COVID was that the “the 150-year-old social
contract of public schooling in America – you must show up, we must educate you
– was broken.” This feels like a well-known tale of woe (lost food service, no routine, limited social interaction) and only sporadic acknowledgement of
what was accomplished (Zoom … “went from hosting ten million people daily in
December 2019 to two hundred million in March 2020”). Kamenetz writes more
about the 1930s Works Progress Administration than she does about state boards of
education and local administrators, making little effort to hold them
accountable even though they are the ones who kept moving goalposts (class
length and daily schedules), who reduced rigor for millions of students (no
grades and flexible deadlines) and did not do enough to actively encourage attendance
(e.g., Los Angeles school district reported that on an average Spring day in
2020 “only about 36 percent of middle and high school students participated in
online learning”). I have vivid memories of spending inordinate amounts of time
tracking down students who simply did not do the work and who seemed to have no
incentive to create a make-up plan. Teachers were expected to add this task to
an already overflowing to do list where learning more effective and engaging use
of new technology could have been a priority.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Welcome to Continuing the Conversation!
We are in the midst of migrating book reviews to this new blog. To see past reveiws and comments, please visit Book Talk ... A Conversation...
-
I CHEERFULLY REFUSE by Leif Enger has a beautiful, eye-catching cover which reflects the many layers involved in this latest story from an ...
-
Here (in no particular order) is our compilation of some of the “Best of the Year” lists, updated for 2024: National Public Radio provid...
-
GROUNDS FOR MURDER by Betty Ternier Daniels is a debut mystery in the Jeannie Wolfert-Lang series. I am grateful for the free preview copy ...
No comments:
Post a Comment