DANGEROUS CHARISMA by Jerrold Post is about “The Political Psychology of Donald Trump and His Followers.” We have heard SO much about that in the past few weeks as the 2024 election cycle ramps up. It is extremely disconcerting. Post, who served multiple decades with the CIA and was the founding director of the Center for the Analysis of Personality and Political Behavior, divided his text into three sections: the Charismatic Leader, the Political Psychology of Trump’s Followers, and Trump’s Impact. In a chapter titled “The Quintessential Narcissist,” Post noted traits like inability to empathize with others, no constraint of conscience, paranoid orientation, unconstrained aggression, underlying insecurity, and extreme sensitivity to slight; he included numerous and varied examples relating to Trump. In a later section Post noted, “there is a quality of mutual intoxication for both sides, whereby Trump reassures his followers who in turn reassure him of his self-worth.” Another chapter, called “Permission to Hate,” chronicles how Trump’s “derogatory language has the power to inspire hate crimes” and “using hateful rhetoric toward already discriminated against groups helps make a climate where hate is more acceptable.” Numerous statistics support these assertions. This text was published in 2019 so that was prior to January 6, 2021. Post did not see that day (he died in late 2020), but in this book he acknowledged the possibility of Trump not accepting the election results. Post’s wife says, “He felt … that psychiatrists have a duty to warn.” Unfortunately, we see much of what Post predicted coming to the forefront of American politics again. Kirkus summed up DANGEROUS CHARISMA well: “A damning study of Trump’s mind that goes a long way toward explaining some damnably odd behavior.” More recently, The Washington Post published an article titled “Science is revealing why American politics are so intensely polarized” which, like Jerrold Post, turns to political psychology for explanations. It discusses tribalism and “othering, aversion, and moralization” to activate emotional responses.
Friday, January 19, 2024
Saturday, January 6, 2024
Oath and Honor by Liz Cheney
OATH AND HONOR by Liz Cheney is a text which every American should read. This memoir (and a warning, as it is subtitled) sold out on its release day in early December and has been topping sales charts since then. Cheney, a former Congesswoman from Wyoming and previously part of the Republican Party’s leadership, lays out events leading up to the January 6th 2021 insurrection and the subsequent House investigation for which she was Vice Chair. Her perspective is detailed and unique due to the many contacts which she and her family have in the political and legal sphere. The events which she recounts are disturbing, particularly the unprincipled stance from so many of her colleagues. Throughout the remainder of this election season, we will all have an opportunity to educate ourselves, to reflect on true American and Constitutional values, and ultimately to make informed decisions in the upcoming primaries and general elections. Read and decide for yourself; here is an interview with Cheney about OATH AND HONOR from the PBS NewsHour:
If you would like to hear and see more of her book talk and reading at Politics and Prose in DC, click here or read a review from The Washington Post. More perspective is available in RENEGADE by Adam Kinzinger from Illinois.
Monday, October 2, 2023
Mr. Texas by Lawrence Wright
“‘Crazy ideas can turn into crazy public policy,’ said Wanda [Sonny’s aide]. ‘History is one long struggle for sanity.’”
“A pro-choice bill has about as much chance in the Texas Legislature as a kangaroo in a hockey rink.”
“‘And a shitload of new voting restrictions,’ said Gilbert. ‘When are you guys gonna start believing in democracy?’ ‘Democracy is fine as long as the right people vote,’ said Carl.”
Sadly, many of Wright’s references are reflected in the
actual state politics like media influence: “A common affliction among billionaires is the belief that
money equals wisdom. To share his abundant opinions, Mr. Peeples started his
own radio station.” Or regarding Governor Greg Abbott’s efforts to limit local regulation,
as also profiled here
and here
in The Texas Tribune. One idea Wright missed? A chance to showcase the
MAGA work from Mothers Against Greg Abbott – thought provoking and clever commercials from a
grassroots group. Combining satire and humor with social justice themes, MR. TEXAS
appears on The New York Times’ list of 34 Works of Fiction to Read This Fall.
Thursday, July 21, 2022
One Person, One Vote by Nick Seabrook
ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE by Nick Seabrook is a recent addition to the many texts on voting rights and restrictions. Here, Seabrook, a professor in the department of political science and public administration at the University of North Florida, describes “A Surprising History of Gerrymandering in America.” He begins with a quote from Thomas Hofeller, a Republican strategist, which says: “Redistricting is like an election in reverse! Usually the voters get to pick the politicians. In redistricting, the politicians get to pick the voters!” Seabrook briefly touches on “rotten boroughs” in thirteenth century England and then shares chilling tales involving the vindictive rule of George Burrington during the 1730s in North Carolina. He moves forward in time to the 1830s, when a salamander-shaped district drawn in Massachusetts was proposed to help elect Governor Elbridge Gerry’s Democratic-Republican Party. The nickname "Gerrymander" was coined and has been used since, especially in describing Democratic efforts in California in the 1980s and more recently Republican efforts in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina. Seabrook eventually circles back to Hofeller, detailing his involvement as a “key figure” in the REDMAP project which “utilize[d] sophisticated computer software … and highly granular data on the voting population, to manipulate district boundaries with a level of precision and microtargeting never before seen in American history.” Late last year, The New York Times also described district boundary changes in Illinois (resulting in Adam Kinzinger deciding not to run for re-election) and in Texas. Often, it is judicial review and the more recent events which are of greatest interest to our students, but Seabrook provides some fascinating details about prior times, too, like Felix Frankfurter’s opinions in the 1930s and Barbara Jordan, Curtis Graves, and Lauro Cruz’s efforts to be elected in 1960s Texas. Seabrook advocates for more non-partisan efforts and independent commissions (see map for some information). ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE has been characterized as dense and it does have a scholarly tone, but received a starred review from Library Journal. For related information on this topic, see One Person, No Vote by Carol Anderson in addition to the roughly twenty pages of sources listed in Seabrook’s extensive bibliography.
Thursday, June 4, 2020
Mysteries: The Guest List & The Voter File
Welcome to Continuing the Conversation!
We are in the midst of migrating book reviews to this new blog. To see past reveiws and comments, please visit Book Talk ... A Conversation...
-
HEART OF A STRANGER by Angela Buchdahl is certainly in contention for my favorite book of the year. That is a surprise because this is the ...
-
MRS. ENDICOTT'S SPLENDID ADVENTURE is the latest historical fiction from Rhys Bowen ( In Farleigh Field ). She is a personal favorite a...
-
EAT YOUR ICE CREAM by Ezekiel J. Emanuel offers “Six Simple Rules for a Long and Healthy Life.” Emanuel, a bioethicist and professor at the...